Why the study?
The association between carotid plaque features and collateral circulation status in elderly patients with moderate to severe carotid stenosis was not determined.
Are carotid plaque features associated with collateral circulation status in elderly patients with chronic carotid stenosis?
Are carotid plaque features associated with collateral circulation status in elderly patients with chronic carotid stenosis?
In elderly patients with carotid stenosis, specific plaque features (normalized wall index and fibrous cap rupture) combined with traditional risk factors can effectively predict poor collateral circulation.
May aid noninvasive collateral assessment in carotid stenosis; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective validation before clinical adoption.
OBJECTIVE: To determine the association of carotid plaque features with collateral circulation status in elderly patients with moderate to severe carotid stenosis. METHODS: Elderly patients (> 60 years) with moderate to severe carotid stenosis were recruited and categorized into good and poor collateral circulation groups, and underwent magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography imaging. The carotid plaque features including lipid-rich necrotic core, intraplaque hemorrhage, calcification, and fibrous cap rupture (FCR) were evaluated, and maximum wall thickness, normalized wall index (NWI), and luminal stenosis were measured. The association between these variables and collateral circulation status was analyzed. RESULTS: = 0.020) were associated with poor collateral circulation after adjustment for the confounding factors. The combination of NWI, FCR, systolic blood pressure, and triglycerides had the highest area-under-the-curve (AUC = 0.85) for detection of poor collaterals. CONCLUSIONS: Carotid plaque features, specifically NWI and FCR, are independently associated with poor collateral circulation, and the combination of carotid plaque features and traditional risk factors has a stronger predictive value for poor collateral circulation than plaque features alone.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Xu et al. (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: