Why the study?
Does an educational intervention improve knowledge and correct clinical decision making for continuous ST-segment monitoring in registered nurses?
Does an educational intervention improve knowledge and correct clinical decision making for continuous ST-segment monitoring in registered nurses?
Focused education significantly improves nurses' knowledge and clinical decision-making regarding continuous ST-segment monitoring.
May support ST-segment monitoring education in critical care nursing curricula; leaves open durability and patient outcome effects.
BACKGROUND: Continuous ST-segment monitoring can result in detection of myocardial ischemia, but in clinical practice, continuous ST-segment monitoring is conducted incorrectly and underused by many registered nurses (RNs). Many RNs are unable to correctly institute ST-segment monitoring guidelines because of a lack of education. PURPOSE: To evaluate whether an educational intervention, provided to 32 RNs, increases knowledge and correct clinical decision making (CDM) for the use of continuous ST-segment monitoring. METHODS: At a single institution, an ST-segment monitoring class was provided to RNs in 2 cardiovascular units. Knowledge and correct CDM instruments were used for a baseline pretest and subsequent posttest after ST-segment monitoring education. RESULTS: Statistical significance between pretest and posttest scores for knowledge and correct CDM practice was noted with dependent t tests (P = .0001). CONCLUSIONS: Many RNs responsible for electrocardiographic monitoring are not aware of evidence-based ST-segment monitoring practice guidelines and cannot properly place precordial leads needed for ST-segment monitoring. Knowledge and correct CDM with ST-segment monitoring can be improved with focused education.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Connie Chronister (2014) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: