Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The rate constant k(1) of the reaction F + HNO3 → HF ± NO3 at 298 K has been redetermined using two fast flow systems employing different detectors. In the first, growth of NO3 was measured by mass‐spectrometric detection of the ion signal at m/e 62. In the other, the decay of F‐atoms was measured by following their ESR signal. Uncoated quartz flow tubes were used in both cases. The reactants were kept in the range 12 < [HNO3]/[F] < 140 in all experiments such that pseudo‐first‐order evaluation of the data was possible and secondary reactions were suppressed. A total of 52 experiments with [HNO3] in the range (2.5–8.2) · 1013 cm−3 yielded k(1) = (2.2 ± 0.2) · 10−11 cm3 molecule−1 s−1, where the error stated is the random error 2σ for 96% confidence limit. Model calculations have shown that the systematic error in k(1) due to secondary reactions is less than 2%. The total systematic error in k(1) is estimated to be 10%. The effect of poisoning the flow tube with halocarbon wax was studied in a few experiments and an interpretation for the observation is suggested.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Becker et al. (1991) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: