Why the study?
Does transesophageal echocardiography accurately estimate left ventricular ejection fraction and end-diastolic volume index compared to scintigraphy in patients immediately following CABG?
Does transesophageal echocardiography accurately estimate left ventricular ejection fraction and end-diastolic volume index compared to scintigraphy in patients immediately following CABG?
Immediately following CABG, a single cross-sectional TEE image provides a reasonable estimate of ejection fraction but is less reliable for estimating left ventricular end-diastolic volume index.
Single-plane TEE may estimate post-CABG EF adequately; leaves open reliable LVEDVI assessment versus scintigraphy.
Transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) has become a commonly used monitor of left ventricular (LV) function and filling during cardiac surgery. Its use is based on the assumption that changes in LV short-axis ID reflect changes in LV volume. To study the ability of TEE to estimate LV volume and ejection immediately following CABG, 10 patients were studied using blood pool scintigraphy, TEE, and thermodilution cardiac output (CO). A single TEE short-axis cross-sectional image of the LV at the midpapillary muscle level was used for area analysis. Between 1 and 5 h postoperatively, simultaneous data sets (scintigraphy, TEE, and CO) were obtained three to five times in each patient. End-diastolic (EDa) and end-systolic (ESa) areas were measured by light pen. Ejection fraction area (EFa) was calculated (EFa = (EDa - ESa)/EDa). When EFa was compared with EF by scintigraphy, correlation was good (r = 0.82 SEE = 0.07). EDa was taken as an indicator of LV volume and compared with LVEDVI which was derived from EF by scintigraphy and CO. Correlation between EDa and LVEDVI was fair (r = 0.74 SEE = 3.75). The authors conclude that immediately following CABG, a single cross-sectional TEE image provides a reasonable estimate of EF but not LVEDVI.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Urbanowicz et al. (1990) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: