Case-based decision theory (CBDT) is a theory of decision-making under uncertainty, suggesting that people tend to choose acts that performed well in similar cases they recall. The theory has been developed from a decision-/game-/economic-theoretical point of view as a potential alternative to expected utility theory (EUT). In this paper, we attempt to reconsider CBDT as a theory of knowledge representation, to contrast it with the rule-based approach, and to study its implications regarding the process of induction.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gilboa et al. (2000) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: