No AccessAmerican Journal of AudiologyLetter to the Editor1 Jul 1995Opening Pandora's BoxThe Reliability of CAPD Tests Anthony T. Cacace and Dennis J. McFarland Anthony T. Cacace Albany Medical College Albany, NY Google Scholar More articles by this author and Dennis J. McFarland New York State Health Department Albany, NY Google Scholar More articles by this author https://doi.org/10.1044/1059-0889.0402.61 SectionsAboutFull TextPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationTrack Citations ShareFacebookTwitterLinked In "Opening Pandora's Box." American Journal of Audiology, 4(2), pp. 61–62 References Franzen, M. D. (1989). Reliability and validity in neuropsychological assessment. New York: Plenum Press. Google Scholar Gleser, G. C., Cronbach, L. J., & Rajaratnam, N. (1965). Generalizability of scores influenced by multiple sources of variance.Psychometrika, 30, 395–418. CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar Heise, D. R. (1969). Separating reliability and stability in test-retest correlation.American Sociological Review, 34, 93–104. CrossrefGoogle Scholar Keith, R. (1986). SCAN: A screening test for auditory processing disorders. TX: The Psychological Corporation, Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, Inc. Google Scholar Levitt, H. (1971). Transformed up-down method in psychoacoustics.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 49, 467–477. CrossrefGoogle Scholar Musiek, F. E., & Chermak, G. D. (1994). Three commonly asked questions about central auditory processing disorders: Assessment.American Journal of Audiology, 3(3), 23–27. LinkGoogle Scholar Wilson, R. H. (1994). Introduction by guest editor.Journal of the American Academy of Audiology, (4). Google Scholar Additional Resources FiguresReferencesRelatedDetailsCited By International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology (109848)1 Dec 2019Test-Retest Reliability of the Greek Speech-in-Babble Test (SinB) as a potential Screening Tool for Auditory Processing DisorderValentinos Sofokleous, Maria Marmara, Georgios K. Panagiotopoulos, Stellina Mouza, Maria Tsofidou, Afroditi Sereti, Ioanna Grigoriadi, Eleftherios Petridis, Christos Sidiras, Michael Tsiourdas and Vasiliki (Vivian) Iliadou Ear and Hearing30:6 (675-686)1 Dec 2009Temporal Auditory and Visual Motion Processing of Children Diagnosed with Auditory Processing Disorder and DyslexiaPiers Dawes, Tony Sirimanna, Martin Burton, Iynga Vanniasegaram, Frances Tweedy and Dorothy V. M. Bishop International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology72:4 (483-489)1 Apr 2008Profile and aetiology of children diagnosed with auditory processing disorder (APD)Piers Dawes, Dorothy V.M. Bishop, Tony Sirimanna and Doris-Eva Bamiou American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology17:1 (4-18)1 Feb 2008Auditory Processing Disorders: An Update for Speech-Language PathologistsDavid A. DeBonis and Deborah Moncrieff Ear and Hearing26:2 (109-119)1 Apr 2005Do ???Auditory Processing??? Tests Measure Auditory Processing in the Elderly?Larry E. Humes American Journal of Audiology11:1 (7-9)1 Jun 2002Factor Analysis in CAPD and the "Unimodal" Test BatteryDennis J. McFarland and Anthony T. CacaceAmerican Journal of Audiology8:2 (137-142)1 Dec 1999Implications From Factor Analysis for Central Auditory Processing DisordersRonald L. Schow and Gail ChermakJournal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research41:2 (355-373)1 Apr 1998Central Auditory Processing Disorder in School-Aged ChildrenAnthony T. Cacace and Dennis J. McFarlandJournal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research41:4 (834-845)1 Aug 1998SCAN Test-Retest Reliability for First- and Third-Grade ChildrenNathan E. Amos and Larry E. HumesAmerican Journal of Audiology4:3 (36-48)1 Nov 1995Modality Specificity as a Criterion for Diagnosing Central Auditory Processing DisordersDennis J. McFarland and Anthony T. Cacace Volume 4Issue 2July 1995Pages: 61-62 Get Permissions Add to your Mendeley library History Published in issue: Jul 1, 1995 Metrics Downloaded 16 times Topicsasha-topicsleader-topicsasha-article-typesCopyright & PermissionsCopyright © 1995 American Speech-Language-Hearing AssociationLoading ...
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cacace et al. (1995) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: