Why the study?
Does a flexible and individualised approach to enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) pathways improve outcomes in colorectal surgery compared to rigid adherence?
Does a flexible and individualised approach to enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) pathways improve outcomes in colorectal surgery compared to rigid adherence?
This review suggests that a flexible and individualized approach to ERAS protocols in colorectal surgery may be more appropriate than rigid adherence.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Should not yet change ERAS practice in colorectal surgery; leaves open whether flexible protocols improve outcomes pending prospective trials.
Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) employs a multimodal perioperative care pathway with the aim of attenuating the stress response to surgery and accelerating recovery. It has been difficult to determine the relative importance of some of the individual components of these pathways such as epidural analgesia and laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Some argue that only a rigid adherence to the published ERAS protocol can achieve the proposed benefits of fast-track surgery. In this article, we explore some of the areas where the evidence base may be changing and ask whether a more flexible and individualised approach should be considered.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Alison Lyon (2012) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: