Why the study?
Although transapical procedures have decreased worldwide with improving transfemoral devices, the left ventricular apex remains a safe, valid alternative access for various non-aortic structural heart procedures.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The transapical approach remains a safe and valid alternative access for various structural heart procedures when peripheral access is unsuitable.
Since the advent of TAVR (transcatheter aortic valve replacement), the transapical surgical approach has been affirmed as a safe and effective alternative access for patients with unsuitable peripheral arteries. With the improvement of devices for transfemoral approach and the development of other alternative accesses, the number of transapical procedures has decreased significantly worldwide. The left ventricular apex, however, has proved to be a safe and valid alternative access for various other structural heart procedures such as mitral valve repair, mitral valve-in-valve or valve-in-ring replacement, transcatheter mitral valve replacement (TMVR), transcatheter mitral paravalvular leak repair, and thoracic aorta endovascular repair (TEVAR). We review the literature and our experience of various hybrid transcatheter structural heart procedures using the transapical surgical approach and discuss pros and cons.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Agostinelli et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: