Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
SUMMARY The sorption of inorganic anions by hydrous ferric oxide gel (Fe gel) from 10 −1 M NaClO 4 at pH 6.5 decreased in the order: orthophosphate (H 2 PO 4 )>arsenate (H 2 AsO 4 ) = selenite (HseO3) > silicate (H 4 SiO 4 ) > molybdate (MoO 2 4 − ) > sulphate (SO 2 4 − ) > selenate(SeO 2 4 − )>chloride (Cl − ) = nitrate (NO − 3 ). When each anion was added to Fe gel with an equimolar quantity of H 2 PO − 4 , there was no detectable effect of SO 2 4 − , SeO 2 4 − , Cl − , and NO − 3 on the amount of H 2 PO − 4 sorbed. Other anions depressed H 2 PO 4 sorption in the order H 2 AsO 4 >HseO 3 > H 4 SiO 4 > MoO 2 4 . At the lowest level of anion addition (500 mmol kg −1 ), H 2 PO 4 sorption was depressed by no more than 6% of the sorption level in the absence of a competing anion. In contrast, at the highest level of anion addition (1700 mmol kg‐ 1 of each), H 2 AsO 4 decreased H 2 PO 4 sorption by 44%. The sorption of SO 4 − was completely eliminated when this anion was added with equimolar amounts of H 2 PO 4 . The ability of anions to compete with H 2 PO 4 for sorption sites could not be explained solely by the results obtained for the sorption of each anion alone. Thus, H 2 AsO 4 was more competitive than H 2 PO 4 when added together, even though more H 2 PO 4 than H 2 AsO 4 was sorbed when each anion was added alone. Although H 2 PO 4 was sorbed in larger amounts, there is no evidence to suggest that H 2 PO 4 . H 2 AsO 4 , and HseO 3 were sorbed on different sites.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ryden et al. (1987) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: