Tuberculosis (TB) is a major cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. One hundred and nineteen acid‐fast bacilli‐positive smears for Mycobacterium Growth Indicator Tube cultures from 119 patients were examined by microscopy for the presence of cord formation. The results were compared with those of the traditional TB identification method, IS6110 polymerase chain reaction (PCR), and the Capilia TB assay which uses a monoclonal antibody to identify. With the traditional TB identification method, 57 of these 119 specimens were determined to be positive for Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex, and the organisms in the remaining 62 specimens were identified as non‐tuberculosis mycobacteria (NTM). Both IS6110 PCR and the Capilia TB assay yielded results identical to those of the traditional method with 57 true TB and 62 NTM. For the cord formation assay, all 62 NTM cultures were negative, but 54 of the 57 true TB cultures were positive. Therefore, the cord formation method had a sensitivity of 94.74% (54/57), specificity of 100% (62/62), negative predictive value of 95.38% (62/65) and positive predictive value of 100% (54/54) for identification of M. tuberculosis complex. The cord formation method is less expensive and 3–5 weeks quicker than the biochemical tests in the identification of M. tuberculosis. PRACTICAL APPLICATIONS Due to the slow growth of Mycobacterium tuberculosis bacilli, delays in the detection of TB infection may occur in clinical TB laboratories when only conventional methods for recovery of mycobacteria are used. This problem can be supported by other techniques, such as cord formation in Kinyoun‐stained smears of Mycobacterium Growth Indicator Tube cultures and molecular biology‐based systems, which can be used in combination to obtain accurate results in a much shorter period of time.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sun et al. (2009) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: