A group of 41 learning disabled children in Hawaii, aged 6 to 151/2, were tested on the WISC-R. Two main questions were explored: (a) Do the separate WISC-R tests assess “g” for learning disabled children to the same degree that they do for normal children? (b) Is there significantly more scatter among the tests for learning disabled than for normal youngsters? The answers to these questions were interpreted in terms of their diagnostic significance.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Anderson et al. (1976) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context:
More from Psychology in the Schools