Colloidal aggregation of aminoplastic polycondensation resins: Urea–formaldehyde versus melamine–formaldehyde and melamine–urea–formaldehyde resins

Colloidal particles formation followed by their clustering have been shown to be the normal way of ageing of aminoplastic resins, namely urea–formaldehyde (UF) resins, melamine–formaldehyde (MF) resins, and melamine–urea–formaldehyde (MUF) resins. Ageing or further advancement of the resin by other means such as longer condensation times causes whitening of the resin. This is a macroscopic indication of both the formation of colloidal particles and of their clustering. It eventually progresses to resins, which are mostly in colloidal, clustered state, followed much later on by a supercluster formation starting to involve the whole resin. The initial, filament‐like colloidal aggregates formed by UF resins have different appearance than the globular ones formed by MF resins. MUF resins present a short rod‐like appearance hybrid between the two. GPC has been shown to detect the existence of colloidal superaggregates in a UF resin, while smaller aggregates might not be detected at all. The star‐like structures visible in the colloidal globules of MF resins are likely to be light interference patterns of the early colloidal structures in the resins. These star‐like interference patterns become more complex with resin ageing or advancement due to the advancement of the resin to more complex aggregates, to eventually reach the stage in which filament‐like and rod‐like structures start to appear. The next step is formation of globular masses that are representative of the true start of physical gelation.