Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Solid-supported hydrogels were prepared by ozone-induced graft polymerization of 2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate (HEMA), diethylene glycol methacrylate (DEGMA), and triethylene glycol methacrylate (TEGMA) onto polypropylene substrates. Angle-dependent ESCA showed a gradient in chemical composition in the near-surface region (thickness 55 Å). The various shapes of the C 1s peaks collected at a takeoff angle of 45° corresponded to what could be expected from the chemical composition of polyHEMA, polyDEGMA, and polyTEGMA, respectively. At a takeoff angle of 15°, all grafted polymers showed a more hydrophobic character with respect to the shape of the C 1s peak. During dynamic contact angle measurements, HEMA-grafted fibers showed the largest contact angle hysteresis, with an advancing contact angle of about 90° and receding contact angle close to zero. A less pronounced contact angle hysteresis for both DEGMA and TEGMA-grafted fibers was explained by a hindered reorientation as a consequence of an increased side chain length of the grafted polymers. A suppressed contact angle hysteresis was also obtained for fibers grafted in a HEMA monomer mixture containing 5% cross-linker (EDMA). Such surfaces also showed good reproducibility when sequential wetting cycles were performed during the dynamic contact angle measurements.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Karlsson et al. (1999) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: