Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Five patients received a Proplast implant in combination two- and three-wall osseous defects. In four of the cases the implant material was removed within 6 weeks due to failure to maintain primary closure over the Proplast and subsequent inflammation. One implant remained in place for 6 months with no apparent visual signs of inflammation. However, an 8 mm pocket remained, the area was reentered, and histologic sections made. The histologic sections revealed Proplast intermixed with bone, and the presence of foreign body giant cells.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Radell et al. (1980) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: