Why the study?
Evidence suggests that mechanisms underlying somatic and cognitive-affective symptoms of depression differ, prompting exploration of dynamic associations among cognitive-affective depression criteria.
Using distribution-based direction of dependence models, depressed mood and anhedonia appear reactive to other depression symptoms, while suicidality may reinforce them.
Highlights potential leverage points in depression symptom networks; leaves open whether this informs treatment sequencing.
Psychopathology could arise from direct interactions between symptoms. Evidence suggests that the mechanisms underlying somatic and cognitive-affective symptoms of depression are different. The aim of this study was to explore dynamic associations among cognitive-affective depression criteria. We used distribution-based direction of dependence models, which estimate whether the presence of symptom A is more likely to depend on the presence of symptom B than vice versa. We analyzed six large samples of adults from the United States ( N = 34,963) and conducted a simulation study to test the performance of the algorithm with ordinal variables and a second simulation study focusing on Type I error. Our results were consistent with the literature: Depressed mood and anhedonia were reactive to changes in other symptoms, whereas suicidality may reinforce other symptoms or reflect factors doing so. We discuss the results in the context of other empirical findings and theories of depression, reflect on the potential of these methods in psychopathology, and consider some practical implications.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Velázquez et al. (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: