Editorials1 March 1989Standard Formats for Electronic Transfer of Clinical DataClement J. McDonald, MD, William E. Hammond, PhDClement J. McDonald, MDSearch for more papers by this author, William E. Hammond, PhDSearch for more papers by this authorAuthor, Article, and Disclosure Informationhttps://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-110-5-333 SectionsAboutPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissions ShareFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditEmail ExcerptTechnical progress depends on standards. Standards for gauge and size make it possible to thread nuts onto bolts. Standards for voltage and frequency permit the use of an electrical appliance anywhere in the United States. Standards for laboratory reagents assure us that test results are consistent over time. Standards have spawned entire industries. The UPC bar codes—the black and white stripes you see on all grocery products—and the MIDI music interface standard ( 1 ) are examples. In general, standards let us mix and match components, create large assemblies from many parts, and communicate efficiently.The absence of standards hinders...References1. Aikin J. MIDI: musical instrument digital interface. Keyboard Magazine. 1986;1:28-31. Google Scholar2. Computer-stored medical records: their future role in medical practice. JAMA. 1987;259:3433-40. Google Scholar3. McDonaldHammondWiederholdJelovsekSimborgSchneider CWGFDK. A discussion of the draft proposal for data exchange standards for clinical laboratory results. Eighth Annual Symposium on Computer Applications in Medical Care. Washington, DC; 1984:406-13. Google Scholar4. BradshawGardnerClemmerOrmeThomasWest KRTJFB. Physician decision-making—evaluation of data used in a computerized ICU. Intl J Clin Monitor & Comput. 1984;1:81-91. CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar5. A Standard Specification for Transferring Clinical Laboratory Data Messages Between Independent Computer Systems. ASTM 1238-88. Philadelphia: American Society for Testing Materials; 1988. Google Scholar6. Representations for Calendar Dates and Ordinal Dates for Information Exchange. ANSI X 3.30. Washington, DC: American National Standards Institute; 1971. Google Scholar7. Health Industry Level 7 Interface Standards. Philadelphia: Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania; 1988. Google Scholar8. Digital Imaging and Communications. ACR-NEMA Standard Publication 300-1985. Washington DC: NEMA; 1988. Google Scholar9. Gardner R. Computerized management of intensive care patients. MD Comput. 1986;3:36-51. MedlineGoogle Scholar10. Rutt T. Work of IEEE P1157 medical data interchange committee. Proceedings of the International Symposium on Computer Assisted Decision Support and Database Management in Anesthesia Intensive Care and Cardio-Pulmonary Medicine, Rotterdam 5-6 September 1988. 1989[In press]. Google Scholar This content is PDF only. To continue reading please click on the PDF icon. Author, Article, and Disclosure InformationAuthors: Clement J. McDonald, MD; William E. Hammond, PhDAffiliations: Nextarticle Advertisement FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Metrics Cited byArtificial Intelligence and Mapping a New Direction in Laboratory Medicine: A ReviewTowards Interoperability in Clinical Research - Enabling FHIR on the Open-Source Research Platform XNATClinical Support Information Systems (CSISs)Pharmacy Information (PHARM) SystemsMedical Databases and Patient Record SystemsThe Role of eHealth in Optimizing Preventive Care in the Primary Care SettingUse of Data from Electronic Health Records for PharmacoepidemiologyThe Development of Medical DatabasesPrimary Medical Record DatabasesComputer protocols: how to implementClinical Information Interchange with Health Level SevenData standards in health careHow the Past Teaches the Future: ACMI Distinguished LectureComputer decision support systems in general practiceDeveloping and Implementing Computerized Protocols for Standardization of Clinical DecisionsAlan H. Morris, MDComputer Networks in Health CareCOMPUTERIZED PROTOCOLS AND BEDSIDE DECISION SUPPORTIntensive Care UnitComputerized ventilator data selection: artifact rejection and data reductionClinical Information Systems for Intensive Care, Pediatric Critical Care, and NeonatologyAcquisition and use of clinical data for audit and researchComputers in Critical CareClinical data systems, part 3: development and evaluationThe usefulness of the computerized medical records of one practice for research into pregnancy loss in dairy cowsSemantic integration of information in a physician's workstationClinical Databases and Critical Care ResearchTechnology Transfer in Medical Information Systems: The Potential for “groupware” and its ImplicationsMedical Education and Decision Support Using Network-based Multimedia Information ResourcesImmunoassay data management and LIMS: a PC-based system in a clinical laboratoryReconciling increasing capability and decreasing flexibility in medical careData Exchange Standards for Computer-based Patient RecordsMedical informatics in the intensive care unit: state of the art 1991A brief historical overview of hospital information system (HIS) evolution in the United StatesMnemonic coding system for clinical data entry into laboratory computers: its effect on quality and efficiency.Human factors and computerisation in intensive care units: a reviewClinical chemistryMedical informatics-an Australian perspectivePractice databases and their uses in clinical researchCan Patient Care Documentation be Standardized for Today’s Computer?Linking Medical Data Standards, Knowledge-Based Systems and the technique of Partial EvaluationMedical informatics: An emerging medical disciplineA Model Medical/Health Information System for Supporting Quality Assurance MethodsA.M.O.S. An All-Purpose Medical Data Organization and Display SystemChapter 24 Report of two Years Long Activity of an Automatic Immunoassay Section Linked with a Laboratory Information System in a Clinical Laboratory 1 March 1989Volume 110, Issue 5Page: 333-335KeywordsHealth careResearch laboratories ePublished: 1 December 2008 Issue Published: 1 March 1989 PDF downloadLoading ...
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Clement J. McDonald (1989) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched one closely related paper. Consider it for comparative context: