Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This paper deals with the problem of the interpretation of response latencies in short-term memory. A paired-associate study using a probe technique was conducted with the main experimental variation the length of the recall interval (1, 2, or 4 sec.). While shortening the interval had a statistically significant effect on recall probability the interaction between recall interval and probe position was negligible. While traditionally response latency is considered a measure of associative strength, such an interpretation seems inappropriate here. As an alternative, latencies may reflect more criterion values than sensitivity as these measures are interpreted in signal-detection theory.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bennet B. Murdock (1968) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: