Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Rate constants of the thermal degradation of polymethylmethacrylate fractions have been measured over a range of temperatures, and the ARRHENIUS equations have been derived. There are two degradation reactions for this polymer; one “fast” reaction, which is chain‐end initiated, due to double‐bonded chain‐end polymer molecules and one “slow” reaction, which is initiated at random. The energy of activation for the fast reaction is much smaller than that of the slow reaction. Both show two levels of energies of activation proceeding from long to short chains. These energies of activation increase with decreasing chain length of the polymer as expected from theory. Whereas the differences in energies for the fast reaction are in agreement with a mechanism consisting of chain‐end initiation, depropagation, and second‐order termination, a reasonable value for the overall energy for the slow reaction is only obtained for a first‐order termination process. Such a reaction is not unlikely, as the polymer film contains appreciable amounts of monomer at this stage of degradation. The energies of activation for the slow reaction increase with percentage conversion as long as some double‐bonded chain ends are still in the system. It has to be concluded that the degradation of isotactic and syndiotactic polymethylmethacrylate, which degrade by random initiation, also have a first‐order termination reaction. On the basis of the results reported here, the confusion in the literature concerning energies of activation for the thermal degradation of polymethylmethacrylate can be understood. These energies do not only depend on chain length but also on the mechanism of the degradation process, range of conversion, and percentage of double‐bonded chain ends in the system.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jellinek et al. (1968) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: