Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Canada’s National Forest Inventory (NFI) relies on photo-interpreted forest resource data provided by provincial and territorial agencies. NFI data are collected at regular intervals in time from a nominal 20 × 20 km network of 2 × 2 km photoplots. Attribute-specific NFI estimates of precision include contributions from sampling errors and uncertainty in the source data. We assessed this uncertainty in NFI photo-interpreted forest attribute data from New Brunswick and Nova Scotia. Attributes examined were: cover type, age, maturity (class), crown closure, height, volume, and area associated with an attribute. Monte-Carlo simulations, with measurement errors superimposed on NFI data assumed to be error-free, showed that estimates of precision were inflated by an average of 7% (range 0%–36%) due to the uncertainty in the source data. Species misclassification and age determination were the largest sources of uncertainty.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Magnussen et al. (2012) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: