Measurements of the reorganization energies (λ) and the maximum values of the electron transfer rate constants (, obtained for −η ≥ 2λ) of two redox probes at monolayer-coated electrodes are used as diagnostic parameters of the location of a probe at the monolayer/solution interface. Kinetics of the electroreduction of IrCl 6 2- and FcCH 2 N(CH 3 ) 3 2+ at hexadecanethiolate-coated Hg drop electrodes were investigated in a broad range of overpotentials extending to values in excess of the reorganization energies of the two redox probes. Rate vs overpotential data were analyzed in terms of the Marcus−Gerischer formalism to yield the reorganization energies and values. The former show that both probes reside initially in an aqueous environment at the alkane/solution interface. A larger value of for the ferrocene probe was interpreted to indicate its closer approach to the interface. Access of the more strongly hydrated IrCl 6 2- to the interface is more restricted by an interfacial water layer. Gradual expansion of the Hg drop, up to 20% of its initial surface area, has no effect on the magnitude of the reorganization energy obtained for IrCl 6 2-, proving that the iridium probe is located in the aqueous environment outside the alkane monolayer film. In contrast, a more hydrophobic ferrocene probe permeates the alkanethiolate monolayer immediately when even a small expansion of the Hg drop of ca. 2% is attempted.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Slowiński et al. (1999) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: