OBJECTIVE: To determine the uptake of a free fruit provision to low-decile primary-school children by quantitatively assessing changes in fruit intake. DESIGN: A randomised controlled trial using a paired, cluster randomisation. SETTING: Twenty low-decile primary schools (schools attended by the most deprived children) in Auckland, New Zealand. SUBJECTS: In total 2032 children, aged 7-11 years, provided data on at least one occasion. INTERVENTION: Ten pairs of low-decile primary schools matched by roll size and location were randomly allocated to control (no free fruit) or intervention (free fruit) for a school term. Dietary assessments using the 24 h recall methodology were made at baseline, on the last week of the intervention and 6 weeks post-intervention. RESULTS: Fruit intakes in this cohort were lower than the national average with over 40 % reporting no fruit intake at baseline and did not differ between groups. After the free fruit period the intervention group increased school fruit intakes by 0.39 pieces/school d from baseline (P < or = 0.001) and the proportion of children consuming no fruit reduced to 22 %. This increase, however, was not sustained and fruit intakes fell below baseline levels at 6 weeks post-intervention. Control subjects did not significantly alter their fruit intakes throughout the study. CONCLUSIONS: Improving exposure and accessibility to fruits at school increases fruit intakes of low socio-economic group children, particularly those who do not normally eat fruit. The present pilot study demonstrates some possible negative effects of short-term free fruit interventions, but is informative for developing and evaluating sustained fruit intervention programmes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ashfield‐Watt et al. (2008) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: