Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This paper considers two approaches by which the Preisach distribution function may be obtained from experimental hysteresis curves, and then compares the results of these approaches with Bate's experimental results. The first method, based upon the assumption that φ(a,b) = φ1(a)·φ2(b), was proposed by the authors in 1958. The second method is valid under other assumptions, and requires simple computations only. The comparison shows good agreement between the two methods, and with experimental data.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Biorci et al. (1966) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: