Authors
Noncompetitive inhibition of acetylcholine receptor-controlled ion translocation was studied in membrane vesicles prepared from both Torpedo californica and Electrophorus electricus electroplax. Ion flux was measured in the millisecond time region by using a spectrophotometric stopped-flow method, based on fluorescence quenching of entrapped anthracene-1,5-disulfonic acid by Cs+, and a quench-flow technique using 86Rb+. The rate coefficient of ion flux prior to receptor inactivation (desensitization), JA, was measured at different acetylcholine and inhibitor concentrations, in order to assess which active (nondesensitized) receptor forms bind noncompetitive inhibitors. The degree of inhibition of JA by the inhibitors studied (cocaine, procaine, and phencyclidine) was found to be independent of acetylcholine concentration. The results are consistent with a mechanism in which each compound inhibits by binding to a single site that exists with equal affinity on all active receptor forms. Mechanisms in which the inhibitors bind exclusively to the open-channel form of the receptor are excluded by the data. The same conclusions were reached in cocaine experiments at 0-mV and procaine experiments at -25-mV transmembrane voltage in T. californica vesicles. It had been previously shown that phencyclidine, in addition to decreasing JA (by binding to active receptors), also increases the rate of rapid receptor inactivation (desensitization) and changes the equilibrium between active and inactive receptors (by binding better to inactivated receptor than to active receptor in the closed or open conformations). These effects were not observed with cocaine or procaine. Here it is shown that despite these differential effects on inactivation, cocaine and phencyclidine bind to the same inhibitory site on active receptors (in E. electricus vesicles).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Karpen et al. (1986) studied this question.