The f-sum rule has been examined at the conduction- and valence-band edges of PbS, PbSe, and PbTe. Experimental values of electron and hole effective masses, and of energy gaps were used. For both two-band and six-band models, it was found that PbTe does not follow the same f-sum rule as do PbS and PbSe. However, it was also found that, for the III-V and II-VI semiconductor sequences (InSb, InAs, InP), (GaSb, GaAs), and [CdSe, CdS (hexagonal)], the members of each sequence do follow the same f-sum rule. It is concluded that the well-known anomaly in the values of the energy gap EG of the PbX sequence [EG(PbS)>EG(PbTe)>EG(PbSe)] is due to an irregular value of EG for PbTe. It appears likely that this anomalous value of the energy gap of PbTe reflects, through the L₆^- conduction-band edge, an irregular value of the $5s$ electron energy of the tellurium atom. It is proposed that the L₆^- conduction-band edge states in PbTe differ from the equivalent states in PbS and PbSe. This difference results in PbTe having an f-sum matrix element different from that for PbS and PbSe; this is the reason that PbTe does not follow the same f-sum rule as do PbS and PbSe. The f-sum-rule plots of the experimental data for these semiconductors have been used to calculate matrix element values.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Richard Dalven (1971) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: