Conceptual analysis reveals limitations of conditional convergence in non-well-ordered physical systems, suggesting standard convergence holds only when continuity principles apply.
Linnebo recently presented a puzzle about infinite sums according to which the net weight marked by a spring balance depends on the order the weights are placed on it when these weights form a conditionally convergent series. The aim here is to show that Linnebo’s analysis has an interesting limitation that has gone unnoticed: its conclusions only follow when conditional convergence is considered on the basis of a well-ordered sequence of operations. The consequences otherwise are even more puzzling. There is however a way to avoid them, but only for magnitudes (which certainly do not include weight nor the like), for which a continuity principle is available (such as the principle of continuity of motion, associated with the position of a material object). This also has interesting implications regarding the metaphysical adequacy of the standard mathematical concept of convergence for a whole class of infinite series, so-called doubly infinite series. Cases are shown here in which this concept of convergence is metaphysically adequate (useful), and cases where it is not.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jon Pérez Laraudogoitia (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: