Theoretical review reveals conscious visual sensations correspond to distinct retinal ganglion cells rather than cortical neurons, suggesting a peripheral physical basis for subjective vision.
The double-aspect theory of mind-brain connectedness posits that Nature's physical aspect includes brain cells which can interact mechanistically, whereas Nature's subjective aspect includes conscious sensations which carry intrinsic subjective value. Scientifically, double-aspect naturalism implies that specific sensations should correspond to unique brain cells. But since the middle of the twentieth century, neuroscientists have been unable to find any neuronal cell-types that are unique to visual cortex and distinguishable from neurons in auditory and somatosensory cortex. The present article alternatively explores findings rooted in retinal anatomy, afterimage psychophysiology, and visualimage-induced electroretinography. Collectively, these findings suggest that conscious visual sensations of a particular color or particular brightness correspond not to neurons in the visual cortex, but to retinal ganglion cells that are structurally unique in their form and composition.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Robert G. Kunzendorf (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: