Theoretical analysis uncovers the ecological foundations of infrastructure cost mis-performance, suggesting nested rationality shapes decision-making under uncertainty.
The Fifth Hand is an emerging behavioural–institutional theory of project behaviour that explains infrastructure project cost mis-performance through interactions among individual decisions, organisational dynamics, and institutional logics. However, the ecological rationality underpinning these interactions has remained implicit, limiting understanding of why cost mis-performance in infrastructure projects arises in volatile, uncertain, complex, and ambiguous conditions. Our paper addresses this gap by integrating Gigerenzer’s cognitive (mind ↔ environment) and Smith’s institutional (institution ↔ environment) traditions of ecological rationality to develop what we term nested rationality. This integration establishes the ecological foundations of the Fifth Hand, explaining how organisational and institutional environments influence reasoning strategies and the interpretation and treatment of recognised cost pressures under uncertainty. Our paper extends the Fifth Hand by providing an ecological explanation of infrastructure cost mis-performance and identifying principles for improving decision-making throughout an infrastructure project’s pre-and-post contract phases.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Love et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: