Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Scoping review protocol maps therapeutic targets in inflammatory bowel disease, highlighting the need to determine whether deeper remission metrics provide incremental clinical benefits.
Inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD)—principally Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis—are chronic, immune-mediated disorders with heterogeneous, relapsing–remitting trajectories and the potential for progressive, irreversible bowel damage and disability. Therapeutic goals have shifted from symptom control toward objective inflammatory control (treat-to-target; STRIDE and STRIDE-II) and, increasingly, toward long-term disease modification. In parallel, the operational concept of remission has deepened successively—clinical, biochemical, endoscopic, histological, and transmural—generating progressively more sensitive metrics of residual disease. A central conceptual gap motivates this review: a prognostic marker is not automatically a therapeutic target. Whether treating to deeper endpoints (e.g., histological remission in ulcerative colitis, transmural healing in Crohn's disease) yields incremental benefit over established targets remains unresolved. A preliminary search of MEDLINE, the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and the JBI Evidence Synthesis database did not identify an existing or in-progress scoping review mapping this conceptual evolution across the full range of monitoring domains. A scoping review is the appropriate approach because the objective is to map the breadth and conceptual structure of a heterogeneous, evolving evidence base rather than to answer a single effectiveness question.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Daniele Napolitano (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: