Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Retrospective comparative study demonstrates equivalent surgical outcomes between hybrid suprapubic laparoscopic-assisted and conventional myomectomy, suggesting a feasible alternative approach.
BACKGROUND: Minimally invasive myomectomy offers significant perioperative benefits including reduced pain and faster recovery. Current approaches include conventional laparoscopic myomectomy (LM), single-port LM, and mini-laparotomy. We developed a hybrid technique, termed suprapubic laparoscopic-assisted myomectomy (SLAM), that combines the superior visualization of laparoscopy with the tactile feedback and suturing efficiency of mini-laparotomy. METHODS: This retrospective comparative study evaluated the clinical rationale, safety, and feasibility of SLAM compared with conventional LM. Patients underwent conventional LM or SLAM according to patient preference following shared decision-making (SDM). Patients with a body mass index (BMI) > 30 or myoma(s) > 10 cm were excluded. All the procedures were performed by a single surgeon. Statistical analyses were performed using Student's t-test (results presented as mean ±standard deviation [SD] with 95% confidence intervals [CI]), the chi-square test, or Fisher's exact test. RESULTS: Thirty-six patients with symptomatic uterine myomas were included, with 16 undergoing SLAM and 20 undergoing conventional LM. The average hospitalization duration was 4.19 ± 0.40 days for SLAM and 4.15 ± 0.49 days for LM (p = 0.807). The operative time was comparable between the SLAM and LM groups (186.0 ± 59.3 min vs. 213.8 ± 48.8 min; p = 0.133). Although estimated blood loss was lower in the SLAM group (140.6±148.3 ml vs. 197.5±223.1 ml; p = 0.387), the difference did not reach statistical significance. Hemoglobin decrease was also comparable (1.14 ± 1.63 mg/dL vs. 1.06 ± 1.87 mg/dL; p = 0.897). The blood transfusion rates were 18.8% (3/16) for the SLAM group and 15.0% (3/20) for the LM group (p = 1.000). No major complications were observed in either group. CONCLUSION: SLAM is a safe and feasible alternative to conventional LM and offers effective myometrial closure and specimen retrieval. While operative outcomes are comparable to conventional LM, SLAM provides a viable "hybrid" option for surgeons seeking to combine minimally invasive benefits with the precision of manual suturing.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lee et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: