Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Simulation study demonstrates improved compliance and disturbance rejection in upper-limb exoskeletons, suggesting safer rehabilitation during spasticity and tremor.
This study proposes a composite control framework for upper-limb rehabilitation exoskeletons integrating fractional-order impedance control, computed-torque compensation, and a momentum-based nonlinear disturbance observer. By combining Jacobian-transpose force mapping, fractional-order impedance shaping, and observer-based compensation, the framework enhances compliant yielding and tracking robustness under non-ideal dynamics. Simulation results show that, under severe spasticity-like impact, interaction force remains within 45 N. Under 30% mass mismatch and strong friction, tracking accuracy improves without reaching the 60 N·m torque limit. Under tremor-like disturbance, 4-8 Hz oscillations are attenuated while low-frequency voluntary motion is preserved, improving compliance, disturbance rejection, and torque smoothness.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
刘春 et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: