Key result
Intravenous arginine fails to shorten crisis resolution time vs placebo in acute sickle cell pain.
Why the study?
Does intravenous arginine reduce time to crisis resolution in children and young adults with sickle cell disease acute pain episodes?
RCT (n=274)
Double-blind
randomized
Yes
Does intravenous arginine reduce time to crisis resolution in children and young adults with sickle cell disease acute pain episodes?
Mean Difference: 7.2 (95% CI -21.6–35.9)
Absolute Event Rate: 60.8% vs 65.8%
Intravenous arginine therapy did not shorten the time to crisis resolution compared with placebo in children and young adults with sickle cell disease acute pain episodes.
IV arginine should not be used for pediatric sickle cell crises; challenges prior phase 2 trials suggesting benefit.
Importance: Acute pain episodes are the leading cause of emergency department visits and hospitalizations for patients with sickle cell disease (SCD), yet US Food and Drug Administration-approved drugs for acute pain episodes are lacking. During acute pain episodes, patients develop acute arginine deficiency associated with longer time to crisis resolution and greater total parenteral opioid use. Multiple single-center, phase 2 randomized clinical trials have shown that arginine is safe, is opioid sparing, improves cardiopulmonary function, and reduces length of hospital stay. Objective: To determine the efficacy and safety of intravenous arginine for SCD acute pain episodes. Design, Setting, and Participants: Prospective, phase 3, double-blind randomized clinical trial conducted between June 21, 2021, and June 13, 2024, in 10 US children's hospitals enrolling patients aged 3 to 21 years presenting to the emergency department with SCD acute pain episodes requiring parenteral opioids. Interventions: Patients were randomized to receive intravenous arginine (200 mg/kg followed by 100 mg/kg every 8 hours until discharge; n = 129) or saline placebo (n = 142). Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was time to crisis resolution, defined as hours from initial study drug delivery to last intravenous opioid dose. Secondary outcomes included total parenteral opioid use (intravenous morphine equivalents in milligrams per kilogram from first study drug dose to last intravenous opioid dose), pain scores, and patient-reported outcomes. Results: Of 274 randomized participants, 271 received study drug; the mean age was 14.3 years (SD, 4.3 years), 51% were male, and 92% were Black. The trial was halted early for futility, as time to crisis resolution was similar in those receiving arginine vs placebo (median, 60.8 hours [IQR, 34.8-109.0 hours] vs 65.8 hours [IQR, 31.1-111.1 hours], respectively; absolute difference, 7.2 hours; 95% CI, -21.6 to 35.9 hours). No significant differences were seen in total parenteral opioid use, pain scores, patient-reported outcomes, or safety events. Conclusions and Relevance: Arginine therapy did not shorten time to crisis resolution compared with placebo among children and young adults with SCD acute pain episodes. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04839354.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Morris et al. (2026) conducted an RCT in Sickle cell disease acute pain episodes (n=274). Intravenous arginine vs. Saline placebo was evaluated on Time to crisis resolution (hours from initial study drug delivery to last intravenous opioid dose) (absolute difference 7.2 hours, 95% CI -21.6 to 35.9). Intravenous arginine did not shorten time to crisis resolution compared with placebo in children and young adults with sickle cell disease acute pain episodes (median 60.8 vs 65.8 hours).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: