Spatial modeling study reveals distinct urban growth regimes and high-pressure expansion zones in Tehran County, highlighting the utility of persistence filtering for relative growth screening.
Urban expansion is often tracked with annual land-cover data, yet year-to-year classification noise can masquerade as persistent urban growth. Previous work has usually treated detection, morphology, spatial structure, driver analysis, and forward-looking modelling separately. Here we follow urban growth in Tehran County from 2016 to 2025 within one linked workflow and then extend the analysis to a 2025–2030 growth-pressure screening under static covariates. Annual 10 m built-up composites from Dynamic World were passed through a temporal stability filter to retain persistent change. Stable growth was classified into four regimes, tested for clustering and interaction scale, and examined using a Spatial Durbin Model and multiscale geographically weighted regression. A two-stage machine-learning branch then produced a ranked growth-pressure surface. In this study, growth-pressure screening means identifying where recent spatial conditions are most compatible with continued growth under unchanged covariates; it is intended for relative spatial ranking under stated assumptions rather than deterministic estimation of future urbanization. Stable new built-up area totaled 107.64 km2, most of it ribbon growth (57.60%) and edge expansion (32.77%). A stratified local validation of 300 samples returned a weighted overall accuracy of 97.30%, and a 27-scenario threshold test retained ribbon growth as the largest regime and edge expansion as the second largest in every case. Clustering was significant (Global Moran’s I = 0.326), with a dominant interaction range of about 8–10 km. Historical backtesting showed strong discrimination and ranking (ROC AUC = 0.979; PR AUC = 0.984; Spearman ρ = 0.902), while exact growth-magnitude performance was more moderate (R2 = 0.341). The growth-pressure surface is therefore more useful for hotspot identification and relative ranking than for estimating exact future growth magnitude.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Seyedbeiglou et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: