Psychometric study reveals robust factorial validity and reliability for a shortened Herrmann Brain Dominance Instrument in university students, suggesting its utility in higher education.
Introduction: The Herrmann Brain Dominance Instrument (HBDI) is an instrument designed to assess cognitive preferences based on the Whole Brain Model (logical-analytical, sequential-organized, interpersonal-emotional, and holistic-creative quadrants). Despite its international application, a validated adaptation for the Latin American context is absent. Aim: This study aimed to evaluate the psychometric properties of the Spanish adaptation of the HBDI ( Jiménez, 2006 ) within a Latin American university student population. Methods: Data from 578 business university students were subjected to EFA to examine structural validity, internal consistency analysis for reliability, and a CFA to confirm the simplified factorial structure. Results: EFA yielded a reduced 11-item structure in Study 1, which was further refined to an 8-item solution (2 items per quadrant) in Study 2. Discussion/conclusion: The findings indicated robust factorial validity, and acceptable internal consistency for each subscale provides evidence of the adapted HBDI for use within Latin American university settings.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Egoávil et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: