Historical analysis reveals persistent reliance on specialized neural co-processors paired with general computers, suggesting these devices serve as material vessels for intelligence fantasies.
This article reconstructs the media archeology of the graphics processing unit (GPU) by locating this device in a history of neural co-processors that begins with early learning machines such as Frank Rosenblatt’s Mark I Perceptron and runs through massively parallel systems, systolic arrays, and Google’s Tensor Processing Unit to contemporary multi-core GPUs and embedded neural accelerators. These co-processing devices have been ubiquitous in the history of machine learning, connectionism, and artificial intelligence. Paired with general-purpose computers, they have been used throughout this history to offload the computationally demanding numerical operations required for the simulation of neural networks. This architecture—pairing a specialized co-processor with a general-purpose computer—has been persistent, in part, because it gives material form to the always deferred complex computational capacities. Arguing that these co-processing devices function in excess of their use in the acceleration of matrix multiplication, this essay deploys Jean-François Lyotard’s and Bernard Stiegler’s concept of the libidinal economy to understand their role as material placeholders for fantasies of computational autonomy and an emergent intelligence to come.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
James E. Dobson (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: