PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
August 22, 2026Canadian Geotechnical Journal0 citations

Strength improvement in biopolymer-treated clay: Decoupling the role of densification and bonding

View Full Paper
MYMehmet Fatih YazıcıRARecep AkanSUSoner Uzundurukan

Key Points

  • To isolate intrinsic biopolymer bonding mechanisms from densification-induced strength gains in stabilized high-plasticity clay.
  • Tested xanthan gum (XG) and κ-carrageenan (CG) under Method A (replacing equivalent soil mass to minimize densification) and Method B (adding biopolymer to original soil mass).
  • Evaluated unconfined compressive strength (UCS), secant stiffness (E50), energy absorption capacity (EAC), curing behavior, microstructure via scanning electron microscopy, cost, and carbon footprint.
  • At 28 days and 8% dosage, UCS reached 1255–1305 kPa with a 163.6% maximum strength improvement under Method B, compared to 639–647 kPa and 41.3% under Method A, confirming the primary role of densification.
  • Under Method A, energy absorption capacity increased by 269–511% for XG and 159–235% for CG, with XG demonstrating stability during natural curing while CG showed moisture-sensitive degradation.

Abstract

This study presents an experimental framework to isolate intrinsic biopolymer bonding from strength gains induced by densification in stabilized high-plasticity clay. Xanthan gum (XG) and κ-carrageenan (CG) were evaluated using two preparation methods: Method A, in which biopolymer replaces an equivalent soil mass to minimize densification, and Method B, in which biopolymer is added to the original soil mass. Unconfined compressive strength (UCS), secant stiffness (E50), energy absorption capacity (EAC), curing behavior, microstructure, cost-effectiveness, and binder-related carbon footprint were assessed. Results show that densification accounts for a portion of the apparent strength gains. The maximum strength improvement ratio increased from 41.3% (8% CG, Method A) to 163.6% (8% XG, Method B). At 28 days and 8% dosage, UCS increased from 639-647 kPa to 1255-1305 kPa, confirming the dominant role of densification. Under Method A, E50 increased with curing but decreased with dosage, while EAC rose by 269-511% for XG and 159-235% for CG. XG exhibited stable performance under natural curing, whereas CG showed moisture-sensitive degradation. SEM revealed coating, bridging, matrix formation, and dehydration-driven structural evolution. Although cement remained cost-effective and carbon-efficient, the framework supports objective evaluation and selection of sustainable stabilizers for ground improvement applications.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Yazıcı et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a895facca7ade938187e841https://doi.org/10.1139/cgj-2026-0287
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Experimental Study on the Physical and Mechanical Properties of Modified Clay Using Xanthan Gum and Guar Gum Composite Materials2024 · 21 citations
  2. 2Investigation of the Effects of Two Different Biopolymers on the Strength Parameters of Silty Soil2025
  3. 3Biopolymer stabilization of clayey soil2024 · 32 citations
  4. 4Experimental investigation on the shear strength, consolidation and permeability characteristics of cross-linked biopolymer-stabilized soils2026
  5. 5Study on the mechanical properties and microscopic mechanism of xanthan gum improved red clay2025 · 4 citations