Retrospective cohort study finds no overall survival difference between chemotherapy and cetuximab in cisplatin-ineligible head and neck cancer, highlighting the need for randomized trials.
BACKGROUND: Patients with locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma who are medically ineligible for cisplatin lack a standard concurrent systemic therapy. METHODS: We used the National Cancer Database to identify patients diagnosed from 2015 onward with non-metastatic, locally advanced squamous HNSCC treated with definitive radiation therapy and concurrent systemic therapy, receiving either chemotherapy or cetuximab (using immunotherapy as a surrogate for cetuximab in the NCDB). Cisplatin-ineligibility was defined using the age and comorbidity criteria from NRG-HN004. Overall survival was compared using Kaplan-Meier analysis and an inverse probability weighted Cox proportional hazards model. RESULTS: The final cohort included 6045 patients: 5441 receiving chemotherapy and 604 receiving cetuximab. In the weighted Cox model, chemotherapy was not significantly associated with improved overall survival compared to cetuximab (HR, 1.08; 95% CI, 0.94-1.23; p = 0.281). CONCLUSIONS: In this retrospective analysis, no survival advantage was found with chemotherapy over cetuximab in cisplatin-ineligible patients. Future, randomized trials are necessary to define optimal systemic therapy in this population.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Demircioglu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: