Experimental study demonstrates distinct microstructural variations in 3D-printed tool steels, indicating key criteria for automotive tooling selection.
Purpose This novel study quantifies and correlates the mechanical properties of 17-4PH and H-13 parts produced by bound metal deposition (BMD) with their corresponding composition, internal microstructure and metallurgical features. The purpose of this study is to establish a predictive understanding of how BMD process parameters influence the final properties of these critical tooling materials. Design/methodology/approach Specimens of 17-4PH (AISI 630) and H-13 (AISI H13) steels were fabricated using a BMD printer and sintered according to the equipment manufacturer’s standard process parameters. The resulting parts were then subjected to comprehensive characterisation, including optical and scanning electron microscopy, energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy, tensile and hardness testing, and quantitative metallography, to evaluate their mechanical properties and microstructural features. Findings 17-4PH and H-13 specimens exhibited significantly different yield, tensile and hardness values. Microstructural analysis revealed substantial differences in internal structure. As-sintered 17-4PH parts showed a large internal hollow space, indicating incomplete densification. H-13 parts displayed a homogenous microstructure with an insignificant inner cavity. Metallurgical details and hardness variations are reported. Practical implications These findings enable AM manufacturers to strategically select 17-4PH or H-13 for tooling, spares and prototype applications, facilitating the production of components with tailored mechanical performance through optimised BMD processing. Originality/value This work provides AM manufacturers with novel knowledge to best select 17-4PH or H-13 manufactured by AM for tooling applications, mainly for the automotive industry, facilitating the production of components with tailored mechanical performance through optimised BMD processing.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ortiz-Cañavate et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: