Key result
Female sex is not linked to higher 180-day mortality after high-risk cardiac surgery despite longer stays.
Why the study?
Sex-related differences after cardiac surgery remain controversial because women often present with higher baseline risk and complexity than men.
Does female sex affect 180-day survival and postoperative recovery in patients undergoing high-risk cardiac surgery compared to male sex?
Cohort (n=1,394)
Does female sex affect 180-day survival and postoperative recovery in patients undergoing high-risk cardiac surgery compared to male sex?
In high-risk cardiac surgery, women experience longer postoperative ICU and hospital stays compared to propensity-matched men, though 180-day mortality differences remain inconclusive.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Women may need tailored recovery protocols after high-risk surgery; leaves open sex differences in survival.
Background Sex‐related differences after cardiac surgery remain controversial because women often present with higher baseline risk and complexity than men. We performed a post hoc propensity score–matched analysis of the SUSTAIN‐CSX (Sodium Selenite Administration in Cardiac Surgery) trial to evaluate sex differences in mortality, postoperative complications, and recovery after high‐risk cardiac surgery. Methods Of 1394 trial participants, 1386 had complete data. Women were matched 1:1 to men using nearest‐neighbor propensity score matching based on age and European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation II (EuroSCORE II), with exact matching on surgical category, yielding 327 female–male pairs. Prespecified sensitivity analyses adjusted for frailty, baseline hemoglobin, renal disease, left ventricular ejection fraction, previous myocardial infarction, preoperative medications, and baseline creatinine. Results In the primary matched analysis, 180‐day survival did not differ between women and men (log‐rank P =0.086; unadjusted hazard ratio, 1.80 [95% CI, 0.91–3.55]; P =0.091). In descriptive matched comparisons, women had numerically longer intensive care unit stay (median, 3 days [quartile 1, quartile 3 (Q1, Q3)=1, 6 days] versus 2 days [Q1, Q3=1, 5 days]) and hospital stay (median, 10 days [Q1, Q3=7, 18 days] versus 9 days [Q1, Q3=6, 16 days]; P =0.292), whereas major postoperative complications were similar. In adjusted sensitivity analyses accounting for the matched design and residual imbalance, female sex remained associated with longer intensive care unit stay (adjusted incidence rate ratio [IRR], 1.8 [95% CI, 1.2–2.9]; P =0.009) and hospital stay (adjusted IRR, 1.4 [95% CI, 1.0–1.9]; P =0.031). Mortality sensitivity analyses were model‐dependent. Conclusions In this propensity score–matched cohort of high‐risk cardiac surgery patients, women showed a longer postoperative recovery trajectory in adjusted analyses, whereas mortality findings were sensitive to model specification and should be interpreted cautiously. REGISTRATION URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov ; Unique identifier: NCT02002247.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zayat et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in High-risk cardiac surgery (n=1,394). Female sex vs. Male sex was evaluated on 180-day survival (HR 1.80, 95% CI 0.91-3.55, p=0.091). Female sex was not significantly associated with 180-day mortality compared to male sex after high-risk cardiac surgery (HR 1.80; 95% CI 0.91-3.55; P=0.091), though it was linked to longer hospital stays.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: