Computational study demonstrates that a diagonal uncertainty layer captures local geometry in text embeddings, indicating a modular approach for diverse sampling.
Embedding-space systems usually retrieve, rank, or recommend from a single point representation, even when the task would benefit from uncertainty or controlled diversity. We introduce DESS, a lightweight uncertainty layer that augments an existing embedding model with a predicted mean vector and an independent per-dimension spread vector. DESS is trained with deterministic element-wise losses, requires no sampling during training, and maps inference-time samples back to available outputs by nearest-neighbor selection, leaving the trained predictor decoupled from a fixed output dictionary. The central question is whether such a simple diagonal uncertainty layer is meaningful and safe in high-dimensional embedding spaces. We show that the learned spread captures real local geometry: on 20 Newsgroups sentence-transformer embeddings, it is strongly rank-correlated with empirical within-class variation (Spearman ρ = 0.94 ). However, it is not epistemic uncertainty: the spread norm performs at chance for held-out-class OOD detection (AUROC 0.49). We then show that inference-time sampling is governed by concentration of measure, with sample displacement concentrating near the spread-vector norm. This yields a training-set geometric rule for choosing the spread multiplier β , which predicts the safe sampling regime on AG News. On SQID/ESCI reranking, the strongest DESS variant preserves the frozen SBERT query embedding as the mean and learns only local spread; with β = 0.09 , sampled reranking matches the SBERT-text baseline without surpassing multimodal fusion or cross-encoder systems. DESS therefore provides a modular, geometry-aware uncertainty layer for embedding-space models, provided its spread is calibrated to local embedding geometry.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Grundetjern et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: