Theoretical analysis reveals shared nativist binaries between decolonial theory and far-right ideology, highlighting how structural shifts in advanced capitalism drive modern romantic anti-capitalism.
This article examines the peculiar conjuncture of decolonial theory and contemporary far‐right ideology. It argues that their shared fixation on the dualism of native and settler is immanent to the development of advanced capitalism, particularly the sharpening of its contradictory tendency to undermine labour as the source of value, and to the crisis‐driven accumulation of fictitious capital over recent decades. Mahmood Mamdani's critique of the settler–native binary and Moishe Postone's critique of romantic anti‐capitalism together illuminate how such nativist ideology privileges the ‘concrete’ over the ‘abstract’ — use value over exchange value — thereby reproducing an ideology that remains blind to the concrete historical totality from which this dualism arises and that can only flourish in the absence of dialectical mediation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bademsoy et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: