Why the study?
Does the type of drug-eluting stent (zotarolimus vs. sirolimus) interact with dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) use to affect the incidence of stent thrombosis at 3 years?
Does the type of drug-eluting stent (zotarolimus vs. sirolimus) interact with dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) use to affect the incidence of stent thrombosis at 3 years?
The risk of stent thrombosis varies significantly between zotarolimus- and sirolimus-eluting stents depending on whether patients are actively taking dual antiplatelet therapy, suggesting optimal DAPT duration should be tailored to stent type.
Stent-specific DAPT tailoring may reduce thrombosis risk; extends RCT evidence for personalized post-stenting antiplatelet strategies.
AIM: To investigate the putative modifying effect of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) use on the incidence of stent thrombosis at 3 years in patients randomized to Endeavor zotarolimus-eluting stent (E-ZES) or Cypher sirolimus-eluting stent (C-SES). METHODS AND RESULTS: Of 8709 patients in PROTECT, 4357 were randomized to E-ZES and 4352 to C-SES. Aspirin was to be given indefinitely, and clopidogrel/ticlopidine for ≥ 3 months or up to 12 months after implantation. Main outcome measures were definite or probable stent thrombosis at 3 years. Multivariable Cox regression analysis was applied, with stent type, DAPT, and their interaction as the main outcome determinants. Dual antiplatelet therapy adherence remained the same in the E-ZES and C-SES groups (79.6% at 1 year, 32.8% at 2 years, and 21.6% at 3 years). We observed a statistically significant (P = 0.0052) heterogeneity in treatment effect of stent type in relation to DAPT. In the absence of DAPT, stent thrombosis was lower with E-ZES vs. C-SES (adjusted hazard ratio 0.38, 95% confidence interval 0.19, 0.75; P = 0.0056). In the presence of DAPT, no difference was found (1.18; 0.79, 1.77; P = 0.43). CONCLUSION: A strong interaction was observed between drug-eluting stent type and DAPT use, most likely prompted by the vascular healing response induced by the implanted DES system. These results suggest that the incidence of stent thrombosis in DES trials should not be evaluated independently of DAPT use, and the optimal duration of DAPT will likely depend upon stent type (Clinicaltrials.gov number NCT00476957).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Camenzind et al. (2014) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 2 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: