Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This paper examines the travel and accommodation patterns at a national and state park in the United States. Visitor hinterlands are described and compared, and the validity of intervening opportunity and stepping stone assumptions is assessed. It is suggested that the former is more applicable to the state park, whereas the latter is more appropriate for modelling visitation to national parks. Furthermore, single and multi‐destination trips should be distinguished and modelled separately.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
G. Wall (1978) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: