OBJECTIVE: To compare the effectiveness of different recruitment strategies in encouraging older women to have a Papanicolaou (Pap) test. DESIGN: A 2 x 2 factorial study. SETTING: Two rural areas of Victoria, Australia. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 10,620 persons aged between 40 and 69 years and designated as female on electoral lists. INTERVENTIONS: A personal letter of invitation and a community-based campaign of 4 weeks' duration alone and in combination. A control group received no active intervention. OUTCOME MEASURE: The proportion of eligible women having a Pap test report issued by the Victorian Cytology Service during the 12 weeks after the intervention compared with the 12 weeks before the intervention, with an intervening two-week washout period. RESULTS: The odds ratio of an eligible woman being screened during the intervention period relative to the pre-intervention period was 3.00 for women who were exposed to the campaign and sent the letter of invitation (95% confidence interval, 2.38-3.77, P less than 0.001), 1.86 for women who were exposed to the campaign (95% confidence interval, 1.49-2.33, P less than 0.001), 1.61 for women who were sent the letter of invitation (95% confidence interval, 1.34-1.92, P less than 0.001). The baseline was a control group who received no active intervention. CONCLUSIONS: Both personal invitation letters and community-based campaigns are effective in recruiting women for Pap test screening. Combined strategies are more effective than single strategies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mitchell et al. (1991) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: