Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Faecal samples from 186 dairy cows representing ten commercial dairy herds with sporadic clinical paratuberculosis (group A), and from 100 dairy cows from herds without a history of paratuberculosis (group B) were cultured for Mycobacterium avium subspecies paratuberculosis (MAP). Two different decontamination methods, a NaOH/oxalic acid method and treatment with 0.75% hexadecylpyridinium chloride (HPC) were performed prior to inoculation of Loewenstein-Jensen agar slants with and without mycobactin. Cultures were incubated for 16 weeks. Acid-fast staining bacteria were identified as MAP on the basis of mycobactin dependency and by PCR-RFLP analysis of the IS 1311-insertion element of M. avium. MAP was grown from 15 out of 186 group A animals (8.1%) whereas faecal culture for MAP was consistently negative in group B. The growth rate of MAP was significantly higher (8.1% vs. 1.6%) and the contamination rate of cultures was significantly lower (17.6% vs. 21.5%) in faecal samples decontaminated with NaOH/oxalic acid than with HPC-treated faecal samples (p<0.01, McNemar's test). Atypical mycobacteria which were grown from 46.8% of NaOH/oxalic acid treated specimens were not obtained from any of the HPC-treated samples. A commercial ELISA with MAP-lipoarabinomannan as the antigen was used to detect MAP-antibodies in unabsorbed sera from all animals. The percentage of ELISA-positive cows was 16.8%. Overall agreement between antibody detection and MAP-positive faecal culture was 15.4%.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Glanemann et al. (2004) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: