Using a sample of 336 carveouts during 1980-1997, this paper shows that the announcementperiod returns increase with the ratio of subsidiary to non-subsidiary assets. This finding contradicts the asymmetric information model proposed by Nanda (1991). Additional tests relate the returns to the following divestiture-based explanations proposed by Schipper and Smith (1986) and others: refocusing of the parent and subsidiary operations, financing of new and existing projects, reducing the complexity of stock valuation, and enabling an eventual spinoff or third-party acquisition. The combined evidence rejects the asymmetric information hypothesis and supports the divestiture gains hypothesis of carveouts.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Anand M. Vijh (2002) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: