The fracture toughness of PVC has been measured by using three‐point bend specimens tested over a wide range of strain rate and temperature. A method has been described of deriving fracture load indirectly by measurement of stiffness from a preliminary “low blow” test in instrumented impact testing. Some limitations of the method, when used with semi‐ductile material of low stiffness, have been discussed. Fracture toughness results have also been evaluated by an alternative energy method, which is however more suitably applied to the lower speed impact test. The curves of K1c versus temperature for PVC contain a weak maximum at a temperature below Tg, the location of which varies with testing speed. The position of the maximum in the time–temperature field has been compared with the locus of the β damping peak derived from mechanical (flexural vibrations, torsion pendulum) and dielectric loss measurements, with reasonable agreement. Static toughness was higher than dynamic, and this correlated with fracture surface appearance, thereby indicating a real difference in toughness probably associated with crack tip craze development.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Johnson et al. (1975) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: