Peritonitis that is caused by Staphylococcus aureus is a serious complication in peritoneal dialysis (PD), but the clinical course of PD-related S. aureus peritonitis remains unclear. All of the S. aureus peritonitis in a dialysis unit from 1994 to 2005 were reviewed. During this period, 2065 episodes of peritonitis were recorded; 245 (11.9%) episodes in 152 patients were caused by S. aureus and 45 (18.4%) episodes were caused by methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA). Patients with a history of recent hospitalization had a higher risk for isolation of MRSA than the others (30.6 versus 14.2%; P = 0.004). The overall primary response rate was 87.8%; the complete cure rate was 74.3%. However, 21 (8.6%) episodes developed relapse and 59 (24.1%) developed repeat S. aureus peritonitis. Episodes that were caused by MRSA had a lower primary response rate (64.4 versus 93.0%; P < 0.001) and complete cure rate (60.0 versus 77.5%; P = 0.023) than the others. Episodes that were treated initially with vancomycin had better primary response rate than those that were treated with cefazolin (98.0 versus 85.2%; P = 0.001), but the complete cure rate was similar. Adjuvant rifampicin treatment was associated with a significantly lower risk for relapse or repeat S. aureus peritonitis than was treatment without rifampicin (21.4 versus 42.8%; P = 0.004). In contrast, initial antibiotic regimen (cefazolin versus vancomycin) and concomitant exit-site infection did not have any effect on the risk for relapse or repeat peritonitis. S. aureus peritonitis is a serious complication of PD. Recent hospitalization is a major risk factor of methicillin resistance in the bacterial isolate. Rifampicin is a valuable adjunct in preventing relapse and repeat S. aureus peritonitis after the index episode.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Szeto et al. (2007) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched one closely related paper. Consider it for comparative context: