The kinetics of adsorption of several positively and negatively charged proteins at the air/water and triolein/water interfaces have been studied. It is shown that adsorption of proteins at these interfaces is not simply diffusion-controlled but is strongly influenced by the energetics of interaction of proteins with the interfaces. Generally, positively charged proteins experience an energy barrier for adsorption at the air−water interface and therefore exhibit adsorption rates an order of magnitude slower than their respective bulk diffusivities. In contrast, the negatively charged proteins exhibit an attraction toward the air/water interface and therefore their adsorption rates are either slightly higher or 1.5−2 times lower than their bulk diffusivities. At the triolein−water interface however, all proteins, except phosvitin, adsorbed at rates 1−2 orders of magnitude faster than their bulk diffusivities. The differences between adsorptivities of positively and negatively charged proteins at the air−water interface, and the differences between adsorptivities of all proteins at the air/water and triolein/water interfaces can be explained convincingly in terms of the energetics of interaction of proteins with the interfaces.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sengupta et al. (1999) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 2 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: