Comparison of auscultation with two‐dimensional and doppler echocardiography in patients with suspected mitral valve prolapse

Auscultation was compared to two-dimensional echocardiography (2D echo) and Doppler ultrasonography in 140 consecutive patients referred for evaluation for suspected mitral valve prolapse (MVP) to asses the precision of the two diagnostic methods. Ninety patients (64%) had midsystolic clicks, of which 42 (47%) had MVP by echocardiography; 6 patients (4%) had MVP by 2D echo but no click on examination. In 15 (17%) of the 90 patients, a click was heard only in the standing or squatting positions and 2D echo did not detect prolapse in the supine position in 10 (67%) of the 15. With auscultation as the reference standard for MVP, 2D echo has a sensitivity of 47% and a specificity of 89%. Of the 140 patients, 51 (36%) had systolic murmurs; Doppler detected mitral and/or tricuspid regurgitation in 26 (50%). In 23 (16%) patients, there was Doppler evidence of mitral or tricuspid regurgitation even though systolic murmurs were not heard. Auscultation shows a 53% sensitivity and 73% specificity for systolic murmurs, using Doppler ultrasonography as the reference standard. Of 48 patients with MVP by 2D echo, 15 (13%) had associated mitral regurgitation by Doppler. The results indicate that 2D echo and Doppler ultrasonography should be interpreted in concert with auscultation for the diagnosis of mitral valve prolapse and for therapeutic decision making.