Key result
An enhanced recovery after surgery protocol for percutaneous nephrolithotomy significantly reduced discharge opioid usage compared with a historical cohort (39.57 vs 116.13 MME, p=0.0001).
Why the study?
The study was conducted to determine the effect of an enhanced recovery after surgery protocol for PCNL patients on postoperative quality of life and pain management.
Does an ERAS protocol reduce opioid usage and improve quality of life in patients undergoing percutaneous nephrolithotomy?
Cohort (n=121)
No
Does an ERAS protocol reduce opioid usage and improve quality of life in patients undergoing percutaneous nephrolithotomy?
Absolute Event Rate: 39.57% vs 116.13%
p-value: p=0.0001
Standardizing medications in an ERAS protocol for percutaneous nephrolithotomy is feasible and significantly reduces postoperative opioid use while improving patient-reported quality of life.
May reduce discharge opioids after PCNL; hypothesis-generating pending randomized confirmation.
Introduction: The objective of this process improvement project was to determine the effect of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol for percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) patients with respect to quality of life (QOL) and pain management in the postoperative recovery period. Methods: An electronic-based medical record ERAS orders protocol for PCNL was instituted at an academic medical center in July 2020. The protocol utilized a pain control regimen designed to minimize opioid medication use postoperatively. We prospectively evaluated PCNL patients' QOL through the Wisconsin Stone Quality of Life (WISQOL) survey and Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement System (PROMIS) at routine perioperative visits. To assess any opioid reduction benefit of the ERAS protocol, we reviewed an age-matched historical cohort n = 66 (before ERAS implementation) to serve as a comparison cohort with respect to opioid usage. Results: After an inception cohort of 95 patients, 55 ERAS patients remained available for assessment with the WISQOL and PROMIS surveys. In comparison with the non-ERAS cohort, the ERAS cohort represented larger stones, more supine positioning, higher blood loss, shorter hospital stay, and more use of access sheath. ERAS patients received a significantly lower amount of opioids compared with non-ERAS patients upon discharge narcotic usage (116.13 morphine milliequivalent [MME] vs 39.57 MME, p = 0.0001). Compared with their preoperative evaluation, the ERAS cohort had significantly improved QOL scores at 1 week, which sustained through 8 weeks postoperatively. Moreover, pain intensity and pain interference scores were improved at 8 weeks postoperatively for ERAS patients compared with their preoperative time point. Conclusions: We demonstrate that standardizing medications in early efforts toward a PCNL ERAS protocol is feasible and allows for reduced opioid use by patients while achieving early and sustained postprocedure QOL.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Girgiss et al. (2022) conducted a cohort in Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) (n=121). Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol vs. Historical non-ERAS cohort was evaluated on Discharge narcotic usage (morphine milliequivalent [MME]) (p=0.0001). An enhanced recovery after surgery protocol for percutaneous nephrolithotomy significantly reduced discharge opioid usage compared with a historical cohort (39.57 vs 116.13 MME, p=0.0001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: